Talk:OTAKU: Difference between revisions

From Heyuri Historical Society
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
ok i think we can reach a compromise without creating a new wikipage
ok i think we can reach a compromise without creating a new wikipage
:>i did not betray, baka-waha. Or at least put it as disputed XD
:>i did not betray, baka-waha. Or at least put it as disputed XD
:I did the undo since OS-tan basically undid kaguya's edit - it's kaguya who made the edit saying ex-OTAKU members betrayed OTAKU, etc. I think a new page makes the most sense personally, otherwise this one is a clusterfuck
:I did the undo since OS-tan basically undid kaguya's edit - it's kaguya who made the edit saying ex-OTAKU members betrayed OTAKU, etc. I think a new page makes the most sense personally, otherwise this one is a clusterfuck --[[User:Anonwaha|Anonwaha]] ([[User talk:Anonwaha|talk]]) 16:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:17, 25 January 2024

i won't get into an editing war with u if u reverse the member list again, it doesn't really matter. But since OTAKU is a bit disputed we could have something mentioning a split in OTAKU, which each side claiming to be the true OTAKU.


ok i think we can reach a compromise without creating a new wikipage

>i did not betray, baka-waha. Or at least put it as disputed XD
I did the undo since OS-tan basically undid kaguya's edit - it's kaguya who made the edit saying ex-OTAKU members betrayed OTAKU, etc. I think a new page makes the most sense personally, otherwise this one is a clusterfuck --Anonwaha (talk) 16:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)