Talk:World2ch - Revision history

Agb001: formatting

2025-06-22T22:35:53Z

formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 22 June 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:# yeah, i should definitely be doing more research rather than winging it with a single source... I do intend to now atleast look at other sources and assemble a less vague picture later. Sorry... I was hoping that some people would help me find sources while it's still under construction, but an actual core page that isnt just 'The other wikipage, again' is kinda important to that... sumimasen, once again (ーー;		:# yeah, i should definitely be doing more research rather than winging it with a single source... I do intend to now atleast look at other sources and assemble a less vague picture later. Sorry... I was hoping that some people would help me find sources while it's still under construction, but an actual core page that isnt just 'The other wikipage, again' is kinda important to that... sumimasen, once again (ーー;
	:# i do want to atleast somewhat archive the reasons why the revival is a plain ripoff and why it and heyuri has teh drama, but it does also make sense why we shouldnt do that. as someone with alot more time on heyuri and just this general sphere though, i trust you have better judgement on why it'd be bad (^Д^) --[[User:Agb001\|Agb001]] ([[User talk:Agb001\|talk]]) 21:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		:# i do want to atleast somewhat archive the reasons why the revival is a plain ripoff and why it and heyuri has teh drama, but it does also make sense why we shouldnt do that. as someone with alot more time on heyuri and just this general sphere though, i trust you have better judgement on why it'd be bad (^Д^) --[[User:Agb001\|Agb001]] ([[User talk:Agb001\|talk]]) 21:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)



	:Could just have the revival section be about the 2022-?? era and stop there, though that might inspire some grumbling from the new revival crowd. At the least, I consider angeleno buying the domain a moment worth preserving.		:Could just have the revival section be about the 2022-?? era and stop there, though that might inspire some grumbling from the new revival crowd. At the least, I consider angeleno buying the domain a moment worth preserving.
	--[[User:Yakuruto\|Yakuruto]] ([[User talk:Yakuruto\|talk]]) 18:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		--[[User:Yakuruto\|Yakuruto]] ([[User talk:Yakuruto\|talk]]) 18:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
	::i feel this is pretty reasonable. angeleno being a part of Heyuri i feel makes it notable enough, and also since during that time the Gikopoipoi instance was hosted there, so if not for history, to atleast answer some questions. --[[User:Agb001\|Agb001]] ([[User talk:Agb001\|talk]]) 21:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		::i feel this is pretty reasonable. angeleno being a part of Heyuri i feel makes it notable enough, and also since during that time the Gikopoipoi instance was hosted there, so if not for history, to atleast answer some questions. --[[User:Agb001\|Agb001]] ([[User talk:Agb001\|talk]]) 21:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Agb001: minor spelling mistake. whoops

2025-06-22T21:57:22Z

minor spelling mistake. whoops

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 22 June 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Could just have the revival section be about the 2022-?? era and stop there, though that might inspire some grumbling from the new revival crowd. At the least, I consider angeleno buying the domain a moment worth preserving.		:Could just have the revival section be about the 2022-?? era and stop there, though that might inspire some grumbling from the new revival crowd. At the least, I consider angeleno buying the domain a moment worth preserving.
	--[[User:Yakuruto\|Yakuruto]] ([[User talk:Yakuruto\|talk]]) 18:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		--[[User:Yakuruto\|Yakuruto]] ([[User talk:Yakuruto\|talk]]) 18:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
	::i feel this is pretty reasonable. angeleno being a part of Heyuri i feel makes it notable enough, and also since during that time the Gikopoipoi instance was hosted there, if not for history, to atleast answer some questions. --[[User:Agb001\|Agb001]] ([[User talk:Agb001\|talk]]) 21:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		::i feel this is pretty reasonable. angeleno being a part of Heyuri i feel makes it notable enough, and also since during that time the Gikopoipoi instance was hosted there, so if not for history, to atleast answer some questions. --[[User:Agb001\|Agb001]] ([[User talk:Agb001\|talk]]) 21:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Agb001: replies :D

2025-06-22T21:53:47Z

replies :D

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 22 June 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	# An article about the actual world2ch of (relatively minor) historical significance is one thing, but don't give free advertisement to shitty remakes whose administration are actively hostile towards us		# An article about the actual world2ch of (relatively minor) historical significance is one thing, but don't give free advertisement to shitty remakes whose administration are actively hostile towards us
	--[[User:Anonwaha\|Anonwaha]] ([[User talk:Anonwaha\|talk]]) 18:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		--[[User:Anonwaha\|Anonwaha]] ([[User talk:Anonwaha\|talk]]) 18:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
			:# yeah, i should definitely be doing more research rather than winging it with a single source... I do intend to now atleast look at other sources and assemble a less vague picture later. Sorry... I was hoping that some people would help me find sources while it's still under construction, but an actual core page that isnt just 'The other wikipage, again' is kinda important to that... sumimasen, once again (ーー;
			:# i do want to atleast somewhat archive the reasons why the revival is a plain ripoff and why it and heyuri has teh drama, but it does also make sense why we shouldnt do that. as someone with alot more time on heyuri and just this general sphere though, i trust you have better judgement on why it'd be bad (^Д^) --[[User:Agb001\|Agb001]] ([[User talk:Agb001\|talk]]) 21:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

	:Could just have the revival section be about the 2022-?? era and stop there, though that might inspire some grumbling from the new revival crowd. At the least, I consider angeleno buying the domain a moment worth preserving.		:Could just have the revival section be about the 2022-?? era and stop there, though that might inspire some grumbling from the new revival crowd. At the least, I consider angeleno buying the domain a moment worth preserving.
	--[[User:Yakuruto\|Yakuruto]] ([[User talk:Yakuruto\|talk]]) 18:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		--[[User:Yakuruto\|Yakuruto]] ([[User talk:Yakuruto\|talk]]) 18:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
			::i feel this is pretty reasonable. angeleno being a part of Heyuri i feel makes it notable enough, and also since during that time the Gikopoipoi instance was hosted there, if not for history, to atleast answer some questions. --[[User:Agb001\|Agb001]] ([[User talk:Agb001\|talk]]) 21:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Yakuruto: two cents

2025-06-22T18:47:52Z

two cents

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 22 June 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	# An article about the actual world2ch of (relatively minor) historical significance is one thing, but don't give free advertisement to shitty remakes whose administration are actively hostile towards us		# An article about the actual world2ch of (relatively minor) historical significance is one thing, but don't give free advertisement to shitty remakes whose administration are actively hostile towards us
	--[[User:Anonwaha\|Anonwaha]] ([[User talk:Anonwaha\|talk]]) 18:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		--[[User:Anonwaha\|Anonwaha]] ([[User talk:Anonwaha\|talk]]) 18:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

			:Could just have the revival section be about the 2022-?? era and stop there, though that might inspire some grumbling from the new revival crowd. At the least, I consider angeleno buying the domain a moment worth preserving.
			--[[User:Yakuruto\|Yakuruto]] ([[User talk:Yakuruto\|talk]]) 18:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Anonwaha: Created page with "# I ''highly'' recommend against writing articles on things you know nothing about - especially if the bulk of the article has to be copypasted from elsewhere ^^; # An article about the actual world2ch of (relatively minor) historical significance is one thing, but don't give free advertisement to shitty remakes whose administration are actively hostile towards us --~~~~"

2025-06-22T18:07:40Z

Created page with "# I ''highly'' recommend against writing articles on things you know nothing about - especially if the bulk of the article has to be copypasted from elsewhere ^^; # An article about the actual world2ch of (relatively minor) historical significance is one thing, but don't give free advertisement to shitty remakes whose administration are actively hostile towards us --~~~~"

New page

# I ''highly'' recommend against writing articles on things you know nothing about - especially if the bulk of the article has to be copypasted from elsewhere ^^;
# An article about the actual world2ch of (relatively minor) historical significance is one thing, but don't give free advertisement to shitty remakes whose administration are actively hostile towards us
--[[User:Anonwaha|Anonwaha]] ([[User talk:Anonwaha|talk]]) 18:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)