Anonwaha at 15:12, 24 May 2022

2022-05-24T15:12:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 24 May 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	..."It is considered to be the lowest Heyuri ever sank..."<br>		..."It is considered to be the lowest Heyuri ever sank..."<br>
	I don't think this is accurate, apart from it using a bad software it still had a relatively high PPD and creation of OCs. Nothing like what we experienced through 2021, where there had been periods the norm was PPD being lower than 5. --[[User:Kaguya\|Kaguya]] ([[User talk:Kaguya\|talk]]) 03:57, 24 May 2022 (EDT)		I don't think this is accurate, apart from it using a bad software it still had a relatively high PPD and creation of OCs. Nothing like what we experienced through 2021, where there had been periods the norm was PPD being lower than 5. --[[User:Kaguya\|Kaguya]] ([[User talk:Kaguya\|talk]]) 03:57, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

			:It depends on what's trying to be said - StrawberryHeaven could technically be considered one of Heyuri's lowest points, as Heyuri didn't even exist! (plus the community-wide depression over what happened previously, and how for a while it seemed like Heyuri was doomed to never return... <span style="font-family:'MS Gothic',monospace;">(;´Д`)</span>)

			:But of course in hindsight, StrawberryHeaven was only temporary - in terms of overall activity level, fun had, OC made, etc. SH wasn't that bad. It just had crappy board software and committed the crime of "not being Heyuri" while acting as a substitute/replacement for Heyuri <span style="font-family:'MS Gothic',monospace;">(^^;</span>

			:I don't want to jinx anything, but now that Heyuri seems to be going through something of a "Renaissance" period, it's become increasingly clear that 2021 was the real "lowest point". In fact, I'll go even further and say that Heyuri's true "lowest point" was the period from February 2021 through to July 2021:
			:*depression from the previous death(s) of Heyuri still lingering
			:*activity slowing to a crawl, most remaining oldbies disappear after January
			:*<span style="font-family:'Comic Sans MS',cursive;font-size:1.5em;text-shadow: 0.0625em 0.0625em 0 #000000a8"><span style="color:#ff00ff">p</span><span style="color:#ffff80;position:relative;bottom:0.125em">a</span><span style="color:#00ff80">r</span><span style="color:#80ffff;position:relative;top:0.125em">t</span><span style="color:#8080ff">y</span><span style="color:#ff0080">b</span><span style="color:#ff8040;position:relative;bottom:0.125em">u</span><span style="color:#0080ff">s</span></span> being MIA
			:*kokonotsuba launching in an unfinished and buggy state
			:*the highly anticipated 10KGET being a lazy and disappointing failGET
			:*Heyuri generally falling into a state of disrepair and neglect (despite many false promises of upcoming improvements and "a new age")
			:*kuz feeling that Heyuri's novelty had worn off and being burned out
			:*overbearing levels of kolyma-ization across the entire site (and subsequent despair over it)
			:*hueg reduction of Heyuri's importance/priority, gets relegated to being one small twig in the large "KolymaBBS" tree (when Heyuri had previously been an entire tree)
			:*kuz launching/adopting boards on other sites that were former Heyuri boards, has teh r00dness to hype up the announcement of said boards on Heyuri as if it was Heyuri-related news
			:*only real positive is Strange World being launched, but at this time it's a kolyma board instead of a Heyuri board (sasuga first half of 2021!), and is thus populated with a lot of crappy non-Heyuri users and faganon
			:*very few archives/screencaps/OC being made during this whole time period, making it a literal "Dark Age" (maybe that's for the best... I don't want to remember it!)

			:...so yeah. I don't think it's fair to label SH as being "the lowest Heyuri ever sank", unless it's maybe changed to "the lowest Heyuri had sunk up until that point" --[[User:Anonwaha\|Anonwaha]] ([[User talk:Anonwaha\|talk]]) 11:12, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

Kaguya: forgot2include "ever sank"

2022-05-24T07:58:21Z

forgot2include "ever sank"

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:58, 24 May 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	..."It is considered to be the lowest Heyuri..."<br>		..."It is considered to be the lowest Heyuri ever sank..."<br>
	I don't think this is accurate, apart from it using a bad software it still had a relatively high PPD and creation of OCs. Nothing like what we experienced through 2021, where there had been periods the norm was PPD being lower than 5. --[[User:Kaguya\|Kaguya]] ([[User talk:Kaguya\|talk]]) 03:57, 24 May 2022 (EDT)		I don't think this is accurate, apart from it using a bad software it still had a relatively high PPD and creation of OCs. Nothing like what we experienced through 2021, where there had been periods the norm was PPD being lower than 5. --[[User:Kaguya\|Kaguya]] ([[User talk:Kaguya\|talk]]) 03:57, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

Kaguya: Created page with "..."It is considered to be the lowest Heyuri..."
I don't think this is accurate, apart from it using a bad software it still had a relatively high PPD and creation of OCs. Nothing like what we experienced through 2021, where there had been periods the norm was PPD being lower than 5. --~~~~"

2022-05-24T07:57:36Z

Created page with "..."It is considered to be the lowest Heyuri..."<br> I don't think this is accurate, apart from it using a bad software it still had a relatively high PPD and creation of OCs. Nothing like what we experienced through 2021, where there had been periods the norm was PPD being lower than 5. --~~~~"

New page

..."It is considered to be the lowest Heyuri..."<br>
I don't think this is accurate, apart from it using a bad software it still had a relatively high PPD and creation of OCs. Nothing like what we experienced through 2021, where there had been periods the norm was PPD being lower than 5. --[[User:Kaguya|Kaguya]] ([[User talk:Kaguya|talk]]) 03:57, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

Talk:StrawberryHeaven - Revision history

Anonwaha at 15:12, 24 May 2022

Kaguya: forgot2include "ever sank"